Friday, March 4, 2016

POEM #12 (Sonnet for Bri)


The sonnet, or “little song,” is a 14 line poem stolen from the Italian love-poem tradition (google Petrarch for details). In English, over the past four centuries it has gained a few admirers and a few recognized forms—the most common one is a meter of iambic pentameter (daDum daDum daDum daDum daDum) and a fairly rigid rhyme scheme. Shakespeare wrote his ABAB CDCD EFEF GG, but any formal rhyme scheme over 14 lines will do.  (ex. ABA BCB CDC EFE FF, ABBA CDDC EFGEFG,  ABCD ABCD EFG EFG,  ABABAB  CDDC  EFFE,  you get the idea). Or--try to use some sonic play that is not about the end rhyme (repeated consonants, emphasis on a specific vowel sound, whatever works!)  

Sonnets have historically been written in the form of arguments, and when I say argument, I mean a text that attempts to persuade. In a love poem, persuasion can be seen in seduction or in a genuine expression of more spiritual and serious affection. When a sonneteer meditates on death or marriage or the decision to beget children, by the end of the poem reasons pro and con have often been discussed and a conclusion reached. You can argue taxes, drum a roommate out with escalating insults, make an impassioned plea for green architecture—anything can be an argument. Sonnets are less often "story" poems, though sonnet cycles (like Rilke’s Sonnets to Orpheus) can be written around an epic narrative. Yet each single sonnet in the Rilke cycle attempts to deeply address just one idea relevant to this tale of love and pride and loss. 

Usually a sonnet contains a “turn” about two thirds of the way through—an AHA! moment, or a shift in logical language (if this and if this and if this THEN this), or a changing of direction (often signalled with diction like “yet well I know” WS 18 or “But” WS 130 or “but just from listening” RI.i. or “Or perhaps he would stay there” RII.xiv. or “but never this /fine specimen” from e.e.c.’s  pity this monster...).  No matter how it is offered up, a turn is nearly always present in a sonnet, signaling the close of the poem. 


So—meter, rhyme/sound, argument, a turn in logic: these elements, plus the kitchen sink—that’s all you should think about including in your sonnets (though in the end... 14 lines and a turn will do).  Otherwise, surprise me and yourselves.

Here's a few:


i carry your heart with me                                 by e.e.cummings
            
i carry your heart with me(i carry it in
my heart)i am never without it(anywhere
i go you go,my dear; and whatever is done
by only me is your doing,my darling)i fear

no fate(for you are my fate,my sweet)i want
no world(for beautiful you are my world,my true)
and it's you are whatever a moon has always meant
and whatever a sun will always sing is you

here is the deepest secret nobody knows
(here is the root of the root and the bud of the bud
and the sky of the sky of a tree called life;which grows
higher than the soul can hope or mind can hide)
and this is the wonder that's keeping the stars apart

i carry your heart(i carry it in my heart)



'pity this busy monster, manunkind'

pity this busy monster, manunkind,

not. Progress is a comfortable disease:
your victim (death and life safely beyond)

plays with the bigness of his littleness
--- electrons deify one razorblade
into a mountainrange; lenses extend
unwish through curving wherewhen till unwish
returns on its unself.
                          A world of made
is not a world of born --- pity poor flesh

and trees, poor stars and stones, but never this
fine specimen of hypermagical

ultraomnipotence. We doctors know

a hopeless case if --- listen: there's a hell
of a good universe next door; let's go



I.i.(from Rilke's Sonnets to Orpheus) 


A tree ascended there. Oh pure transcendence! 
Oh Orpheus sings! Oh tall tree in the ear! 
And all things hushed. Yet even in that silence 
a new beginning, beckoning, change appeared. 
 
Creatures of stillness crowded from the bright 
unbound forest, out of their lairs and nests; 
and it was not from any dullness, not 
from fear, that they were so quiet in themselves, 
 
but from just listening. Bellow, roar, shriek 
seemed small inside their hearts. And where there had been 
at most a makeshift hut to receive the music, 
 
a shelter nailed up out of their darkest longing, 
with an entryway that shuddered in the wind- 
you built a temple deep inside their hearing. 
 

II.xiv. (from Rilke's Sonnets to Orpheus) 

Look at the flowers, so faithful to what is earthly, 
to whom we lend fate from the very border of fate. 
And if they are sad about how they must wither and die, 
perhaps it is our vocation to be their regret. 
All Things want to fly. Only we are weighed down by desire 
caught in ourselves and enthralled with our heaviness. 
Oh what consuming, negative teachers we are 
for them, while eternal childhood fills them with grace. 

If someone were to fall into intimate slumber, and slept 
deeply with Things--how easily he would come 
to a different day, out of the mutual depth. 

Or perhaps he would stay there; and they would blossom and praise 
their newest convert, who now is like one of them, 
all those silent companions in the wind of the meadows.


WS (Shakespeare) 18

Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? 

Thou art more lovely and more temperate: Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May, And summer's lease hath all too short a date:  Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines, And often is his gold complexion dimm'd;  And every fair from fair sometime declines, By chance, or nature's changing course, untrimm'd; But thy eternal summer shall not fade Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow'st; Nor shall Death brag thou wander'st in his shade, When in eternal lines to time thou grow'st;  So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee. 
WS 130
My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun; Coral is far more red than her lips' red; If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun; If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head. I have seen roses damask'd, red and white, But no such roses see I in her cheeks;  And in some perfumes is there more delight Than in the breath that from my mistress reeks. I love to hear her speak, yet well I know That music hath a far more pleasing sound; I grant I never saw a goddess go; My mistress, when she walks, treads on the ground:    And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare    As any she belied with false compare. 

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

POEM #10 (&11): Instructional

Write instructions for yourself. They *can* be instructions/limitations for a poem... or simply instructions for an activity for yourself. Make these instructions interesting. Write them in paragraph, list, or lineated (broken and enjambed lines).

Then complete the instructions.

Then--if the instructions were not instructions on how to write a poem--write a poem about the experience.

Example of CAConrad's Soma(tic) Rituals HERE.

Not exactly the same, but here is an instruction poem by Neil Gaiman (yes, that Neil Gaiman)... HERE.

Some of my assignments below (without resulting poems):

1.

Describe a substance–its properties and affinities. Tell what the substance hates. Can it be held in hand, balanced on the tongue? Is pain involved? Name other likelihoods. What things might such a substance combine with itself to build? Detail its distillation.  Justify the purified form. Discuss, if you can, the substance corrupted. Give six examples.

2.

Tangle. Take two or three pieces of writing–yours and/or others’. Mix. The rules are the same as for one-pot meals: the stirring must be thorough. This is not bread-with-raisins, this is not chocolate sauce on top of ice cream or grilled cheese (so good). This is succotash. Also: simmer. Go away, come back. Go away, come back – fiddle. Add. Excise. Blend. Strain. Stir again. This is an all-day soup – let its commergence pervade your sphere of action for the entirety of a single waking day. Be the richer.

3.

Outline a talk.  In the talk you must be brilliant.  A celestial organism – a sky-whale.  Yes.  Imagine that you are a sky-whale tethered to the earth by a nano-filament and to be once again free, you must argue to the pissants of this small-minded planet the width and breadth of the universe – and why you must be again allowed to breach its surfaces and to search in its most intimate rifts for all that a sky-whale must search for.  Remember, you must succeed according to their rubrics.  Your existence is contingent on their mass decision.  How to seer the mob into seeing.  I challenge you.

4. 

Look at a photograph. Say, an empty chair sitting next to an empty chair. There is so much to say. Explain all that is unrequited and unfinished between them. This is a dialogue. Explain why it is snowing and whose mouths are to be fed before twilight. Have the long heldback conflict commence under the cover of silence. And if they are rocking chairs? Reflect on rust. They must not be an old married couple or brothers looking back. Any conversation should be able to lead to true intercourse, or out to the road beyond the hydrangeas. What are ghosts to one another – what keeps them troubling the air?


Wednesday, February 24, 2016

POEM#9: Cento

Read David Lehman's explanation HERE

Assignment--A cento taken from the lit mag you picked up from me Wednesday. 8-12 lines. Make no mistake, this assignment is a fantastic assignment to do, period, but also can be used to familiarize yourself with something you want to know more about (there's a poet doing centos taken *only* from Sigmund Freud's texts, another from old history textbooks, etc). I asked you to do one based on contemporary poetry to get you wondering what people are publishing now(-ish)ly and to start thinking about sending your own work out into the soup. I'm tricky that way.

Example of a modern cento here:


Wolf Cento

by Simone Muench

Very quick. Very intense, like a wolf
at a live heart, the sun breaks down.
What is important is to avoid
the time allotted for disavowels
as the livid wound
leaves a trace      leaves an abscess
takes its contraction for those clouds
that dip thunder & vanish
like rose leaves in closed jars.
Age approaches, slowly. But it cannot
crystal bone into thin air.
The small hours open their wounds for me.
This is a woman’s confession:
I keep this wolf because the wilderness gave it to me.
Sources: [Anne SextonDylan ThomasLarry Levis, Ingeborg Bachmann, Octavio Paz, Henri Michaux, Agnes Nemes Nagy, Joyce Mansour, William Burroughs, Meret Oppenheim, Mary Low, Adrienne RichCarl Sandburg]

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Homophonic Translation

For those who may want to finish:



nattboksblad

Jag landsteg en majnatt
i ett kyligt månsken
där gräs och blommor var grå
men doften grön.

Jag gled uppför sluttningen
i den färgblinda natten
medan vita stenar
signalerade till månen.

En tidrymd
några minuter lång
femtioåtta år bred.

Och bakom mig
bortom de blyskimrande vattnen
fanns den andra kusten
och de som härskade.

Människor med framtid
i stället för ansikten. 

Monday, February 22, 2016

READING AND REVISION WEEK

Read: THIS ESSAY ON HOW POETRY SHOULD BE MADE ACCORDING TO CHARLES OLSON

Then read: Denise Levertov's essay HERE --4 pages (easier to "get" than Olson's Projective Verse, and also extremely influential)

Then, maybe try this: 


RADICAL REVISION #2: LINEATION



GEOGRAPHY -by Rae Armantout

1

Touch each chakra
in turn and say,

“Nothing shocks me.”

                2

Watching bombs fall
on Syria,

we feel serious,

occupied,

not preoccupied
as we were

previously.

                3

“Makes me end,
where I begun,”

wrote   John Donne,

turning love
into geometry.



A NIGHT SKY  -by Robert Creeley
All the grass
dies
in front of us.
The fire
again
flares out.
The night
such a large
place. Stars
the points,
but like
places no
depth, I see
a flat—
a plain as if the
desert
were showing smaller
places.

So:  

Select a poem that you have written. For the purposes of this assignment, it is best if the poem consists of lines at least ten syllables in length and/or heavily end-stopped lines (meaning that punctuation appears at the end of the line).

After you have selected a poem, arman-trot/creeleyize your poem. In other words, rewrite your poem by breaking your lines at unexpected moments, creating frequent enjambment and short lines.

The purpose of this assignment is to revise the lineation of your poem, exploring ways in which your changes in line breaks and line length open up new meanings and points of emphasis in the poem. It might also suggest possibilities for further revision to imagery and sound.

  • Does the change in lineation help reinforce the rhythm of the poem? Or does it seem distracting?
  • Is the change in lineation appropriate for the meaning of the poem? In other words, does this new form enhance the content of the poem?
  • What words and phrases stand out to you in this revision that did not stand out before? How does this change the poem?
  • What additional ways might you revise the poem to explore other possibilities for making meaning, sound or word play?

Thursday, February 18, 2016

PORTFOLIO

PORTFOLIO - DUE ON THE LAST DAY OF CLASS - MARCH 14th

PORTFOLIO                                                                                                  

Consider this a presentation of your writing process (not necessarily product).  I want you to choose pieces that are going to reflect the most spectacular (think spectacle) attempts you made at writing this semester.  It should be a record of both victories and failures—and most especially, writing still in the midst of becoming itself.  Your revisions should be drastic in some cases… tweaking words and taking out single lines is just not enough.  Prove to me that you can take chances not just in the initial composition process, but in the messy white-heat-of-revision stage.

Your portfolio should consist of:

            1. At least two drafts of 5-6 pieces written this semester.  It would be helpful to me if your drafts included some line-edited pages by helpful peers.

            2.  A copy of all the glosses and critiques you provided for your writing partners.

            3.  A 1-2 page (single-spaced) close reading and reflection on a poem -- that we read for class -- that affected you AS A POETRY WRITER this term. A close reading = a gloss + an examination of the strategies and formal elements that help the poem do what it wants to do.  A reflection = your response AS A POET to both the how-ness and the about-ness of the poem. Use all the craft concepts relevant (rhyme, meter, POV, mood, diction, voice, syntax, enjambment, stanza, etc.)

            4.  For each of your 5-6 pieces I need a description of your revision process (either a paragraph, or sticky notes with arrows, or a hyper-text link, or a talking puppet who accompanies your portfolio and tap-dances Morse-encoded explanations).

            5.  A three-to-four page introduction to your portfolio that tells me who you are/were/are becoming as a writer and/or as a human being in relation to poetry and the work of this class (reading, writing, thinking, sharing, critiquing, and developing as a citizen and a non-passive participant of the world of this classroom and beyond).  Please include in this text some details about your writing partners’ contributions to your work (do not judge them completely by what they “got” or didn’t “get,” but by sincerity and effort as well). 


Please make the portfolio pleasant to behold, handle, etc. Your writing exists as both process and object.  Personalize the object (with your other talents if you like) while attempting to objectify the process in such a way that frees you to substantially revise.



Cheers.

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

POEM#8

Links:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WLazG0bQPI (another version of the one we saw) from Pina Bausch's Cafe Mueller

Jesse Krimes http://www.jessekrimes.com  His work is in the gallery now: http://drexel.edu/westphal/resources/LeonardPearlsteinGallery/current/

Please go there and respond. There are no rules for ekphrasis in my class other than to go... take in the work and write (preferably in front of the work itself, in witness).

I am linking a few ekphrastic poems as things to ponder but you need not imitate any of these in style or substance. The guide should be the work itself.

Read first WH Auden writing about the same painting (The Fall of Icarus) ...early 20th c.

Musée des Beaux Arts

About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters; how well, they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or just walking dully along;
How, when the aged are reverently, passionately waiting
For the miraculous birth, there always must be
Children who did not specially want it to happen, skating
On a pond at the edge of the wood:
They never forgot
That even the dreadful martyrdom must run its course
Anyhow in a corner, some untidy spot
Where the dogs go on with their doggy life and the torturer’s horse
Scratches its innocent behind on a tree.
In Breughel’s Icarus, for instance: how everything turns away
Quite leisurely from the disaster; the ploughman may
Have heard the splash, the forsaken cry,
But for him it was not an important failure; the sun shone
As it had to on the white legs disappearing into the green
Water; and the expensive delicate ship that must have seen
Something amazing, a boy falling out of the sky,
had somewhere to get to and sailed calmly on.

Ode on a Grecian Urn

John Keats1795 - 1821

Thou still unravish’d bride of quietness, 
  Thou foster-child of Silence and slow Time,
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express 
  A flowery tale more sweetly than our rhyme:
What leaf-fringed legend haunts about thy shape 
  Of deities or mortals, or of both,
    In Tempe or the dales of Arcady?
  What men or gods are these? what maidens loth? 
What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?
   What pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy?
 
Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard 
  Are sweeter; therefore, ye soft pipes, play on;
Not to the sensual ear, but, more endear’d, 
  Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone:
Fair youth, beneath the trees, thou canst not leave 
  Thy song, nor ever can those trees be bare;
    Bold lover, never, never canst thou kiss, 
Though winning near the goal--yet, do not grieve;
  She cannot fade, though thou hast not thy bliss, 
    For ever wilt thou love, and she be fair!

Ah, happy, happy boughs! that cannot shed 
  Your leaves, nor ever bid the Spring adieu;
And, happy melodist, unwearied,
  For ever piping songs for ever new;
More happy love! more happy, happy love! 
  For ever warm and still to be enjoy’d,
    For ever panting, and for ever young; 
All breathing human passion far above,
  That leaves a heart high-sorrowful and cloy’d, 
    A burning forehead, and a parching tongue.

Who are these coming to the sacrifice? 
  To what green altar, O mysterious priest,
Lead’st thou that heifer lowing at the skies, 
  And all her silken flanks with garlands drest?
What little town by river or sea shore, 
  Or mountain-built with peaceful citadel,
    Is emptied of this folk, this pious morn? 
And, little town, thy streets for evermore
  Will silent be; and not a soul to tell 
    Why thou art desolate, can e’er return.

O Attic shape! Fair attitude! with brede 
  Of marble men and maidens overwrought,
With forest branches and the trodden weed; 
  Thou, silent form, dost tease us out of thought
As doth eternity: Cold pastoral!
  When old age shall this generation waste, 
    Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou say’st,
  ‘Beauty is truth, truth beauty’--that is all 
    Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.

WHY I AM NOT A PAINTER 
by Frank O'Hara
I am not a painter, I am a poet.
Why? I think I would rather be
a painter, but I am not. Well,

for instance, Mike Goldberg
is starting a painting. I drop in.
“Sit down and have a drink” he
says. I drink; we drink. I look
up. “You have SARDINES in it.”
“Yes, it needed something there.”
“Oh.” I go and the days go by
and I drop in again. The painting
is going on, and I go, and the days
go by. I drop in. The painting is 
finished. “Where’s SARDINES?”
All that’s left is just
letters, “It was too much,” Mike says.

But me? One day I am thinking of
a color: orange. I write a line
about orange. Pretty soon it is a 
whole page of words, not lines.
Then another page. There should be
so much more, not of orange, of
words, of how terrible orange is
and life. Days go by. It is even in
prose, I am a real poet. My poem
is finished and I haven’t mentioned
orange yet. It’s twelve poems, I call
it ORANGES. And one day in a gallery
I see Mike’s painting, called SARDINES.

Ozymandias

Percy Bysshe Shelley1792 - 1822

I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: “Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert . . . Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed:
And on the pedestal these words appear:
‘My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!'
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”